Can Yang

26 papers receiving 459 citations

Peers

Can Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 293
  • Automotive Engineering 78
  • Computational Mechanics 117
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 63
  • Mechanical Engineering 159
Replace T. J. Jacobs with:
T. J. Jacobs United States
Andy Thawko United States
B. F. Gajdeczko United States
Seok Bin Seo South Korea
Rui Zhai China
S.I. Lee South Korea
Ingmar Schoegl United States
Marcus Bollig Germany
M. Mura Italy
Can Yang relative to T. J. Jacobs United States T. J. Jacobs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×
T. J. Jacobs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Can Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Can Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Can Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Can Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Can Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Can Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Can Yang. The network helps show where Can Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Can Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Can Yang Line = papers co-authored together Can Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013118
2 202373
3 201837
4 202332
5 201726
6 202420
7 202319
8 202419
9 202516
10 201913
11 201511
12 201510
13 20218
14 20148
15 20238
16 20188
17 20198
18 20237
19 20226
20 20224

About Can Yang

Can Yang is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Computational Mechanics, Materials Chemistry, Automotive Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 27 papers that have together received 467 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (17 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (11 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (7 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (6 papers), Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems (5 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (4 papers), Advanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines (4 papers) and Biodiesel Production and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (293 citations), Automotive Engineering (78 citations), Computational Mechanics (117 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (63 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (159 citations). Can Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Hui Xie, Xiaobei Cheng, Zhongxuan Wang, Shijun Dong, Zhaowen Wang, Bowen Wang, Hongguang Lu, Medhat Elkelawy, Ahmed Mohammed Elbanna and Weiye Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Fuel, International Journal of Engine Research, Energy, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy and Applied Thermal Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact