Caleb Stica

692 citations
10 papers · 443 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Caleb Stica

10 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

Caleb Stica
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 208
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 267
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 105
  • Biophysics 18
  • Insect Science 27
Replace Roberto Fernández with:
Roberto Fernández Spain
N.H. Zainol Abidin Malaysia
Zhenshi Chen China
Shang-Hua Yang Taiwan
Rafael Carvalho Barreto Brazil
Md. Mahbub Hossain Bangladesh
Jesús Maldonado Mexico
Ankur Saharia India
Ram Bharos Yadav India
Caleb Stica relative to Roberto Fernández Spain Roberto Fernández's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Roberto Fernández · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caleb Stica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caleb Stica's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caleb Stica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caleb Stica more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caleb Stica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caleb Stica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caleb Stica. The network helps show where Caleb Stica may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Caleb Stica, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Caleb Stica Line = papers co-authored together Caleb Stica links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2005278
2 201944
3 201936
4 201927
5 202219
6 202019
7 202111
8 20234
9 20053
10 20062

About Caleb Stica

Caleb Stica is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Molecular Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 10 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Malaria Research and Control (4 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (3 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (3 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (1 paper), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (1 paper), Plant Virus Research Studies (1 paper) and Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (208 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (267 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (105 citations), Biophysics (18 citations) and Insect Science (27 citations). Caleb Stica has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Tanzania. Frequent co-authors include Xudong Fan, Niranjan M. Hanumegowda, I.H. White, Johnson Kyeba Swai, Halfan S. Ngowo, Fredros O. Okumu, Emmanuel P. Mwanga, Salum A. Mapua, Thomas Walker and Seth R. Irish. Their work appears in journals such as Malaria Journal, Parasites & Vectors, Applied Physics Letters, Viruses and Royal Society Open Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact