Caleb J. Winch
Impact in
- Oncology top 10%
- Lymphatic System and Diseases
- Cancer survivorship and care
-
- Breast Implant and Reconstruction
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Papers in
- Co-authors
- John Boyages (9 shared papers)Kerry A. Sherman (9 shared papers)Louise Koelmeyer (7 shared papers)Thomas Lam (4 shared papers)Helen Mackie (5 shared papers)Elisabeth Elder (2 shared papers)Laura‐Kate Shaw (2 shared papers)Asha Heydon‐White (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Breast (2 papers)Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (1 paper)European Journal of Pain (1 paper)Health & Social Care in the Community (1 paper)Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomSweden
In The Last Decade
Caleb J. Winch
12 papers receiving 316 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Oncology 198
- Surgery 72
- General Health Professions 32
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 20
- Applied Psychology 5
Countries citing papers authored by Caleb J. Winch
This map shows the geographic impact of Caleb J. Winch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caleb J. Winch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caleb J. Winch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Caleb J. Winch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caleb J. Winch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caleb J. Winch. The network helps show where Caleb J. Winch may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Caleb J. Winch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 89 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 62 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 0 |
About Caleb J. Winch
Caleb J. Winch is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Social Psychology and Dermatology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphatic System and Diseases (7 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (2 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (1 paper), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (1 paper), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (1 paper), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (1 paper), Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper) and Skin Diseases and Diabetes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (198 citations), Surgery (72 citations), General Health Professions (32 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (20 citations) and Applied Psychology (5 citations). Caleb J. Winch has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include John Boyages, Kerry A. Sherman, Louise Koelmeyer, Thomas Lam, Helen Mackie, Elisabeth Elder, Laura‐Kate Shaw, Asha Heydon‐White, Robert Borotkanics and Catherine M. Dean. Their work appears in journals such as The Breast, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, European Journal of Pain, Health & Social Care in the Community and Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.