C. William Helm

56 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

C. William Helm
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 146
  • Reproductive Medicine 157
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 154
  • Surgery 417
  • Epidemiology 194
Replace Yun Hwan Kim with:
Yun Hwan Kim South Korea
S Y Liao United States
S. K. Khoo Australia
René Hornung Switzerland
Vinay K. Malviya United States
Cristina Rossi Italy
Naoki Sato Japan
Peyton T. Taylor United States
Soykan Arıkan Türkiye
Roopa Hariprasad India
C. William Helm relative to Yun Hwan Kim South Korea Yun Hwan Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.3×
Yun Hwan Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. William Helm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. William Helm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. William Helm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. William Helm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. William Helm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. William Helm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. William Helm. The network helps show where C. William Helm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. William Helm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. William Helm Line = papers co-authored together C. William Helm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008126
2 200992
3 199477
4 200968
5 198667
6 201457
7 199456
8 200851
9 201145
10 199243
11 198540
12 198937
13 198334
14 201231
15 199326
16 201126
17 201224
18 201223
19 201423
20 200621

About C. William Helm

C. William Helm is a scholar working on Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology, Reproductive Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (15 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (12 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (8 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (7 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (5 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Genital Health and Disease (4 papers) and Renal and related cancers (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (146 citations), Reproductive Medicine (157 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (154 citations), Surgery (417 citations) and Epidemiology (194 citations). C. William Helm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include J. Christopher States, A. Bennett Jenson, Jonathan B. Chaires, Nichola C. Garbett, Hugh M. Shingleton, Chongkham S. Mekmaysy, Edward E. Partridge, R. Wendel Naumann, Robert V. Higgins and James B. Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact