C V Ford

674 citations
12 papers · 542 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

C V Ford

12 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers

C V Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 104
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 115
  • Clinical Psychology 161
  • Social Psychology 119
  • Health 33
Replace Kirsten M. Wilkins with:
Kirsten M. Wilkins United States
Bernhard Geiselmann Germany
Regula Herzog United States
Alex J. Zautra United States
Ramona Lucas‐Carrasco Spain
Paul D. Usala United States
C. Knight Aldrich United States
Monica D. Blumenthal United States
Martha Donnelly Canada
C V Ford relative to Kirsten M. Wilkins United States Kirsten M. Wilkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Kirsten M. Wilkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C V Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C V Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C V Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C V Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C V Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C V Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C V Ford. The network helps show where C V Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside C V Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C V Ford Line = papers co-authored together C V Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1980117
2 198885
3
Somatization and fashionable diagnoses: illness as a way of life.
199779
4 198860
5 197635
6 198734
7 198526
8 198825
9 197625
10
Characteristics of general hospital patients referred for psychiatric consultation.
198122
11
Blood cleansing by diafiltration in uremic dog and man.
197120
12 199214

About C V Ford

C V Ford is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Demography, Applied Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 542 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (1 paper), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (1 paper) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (104 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (115 citations), Clinical Psychology (161 citations), Social Psychology (119 citations) and Health (33 citations). C V Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Sbordone, Marc H. Hollender, Benjamin G.C. King, Ronald S. Swerdloff, George A. Bray, Kibwei A. McKinney, Massimiliano Raciti, David L. Rimoin, Jack G. Modell and James M. Mountz. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, The Gerontologist, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Journal of Neuropsychiatry and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact