C. U. M. Smith

58 papers receiving 499 citations

Peers

C. U. M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • General Psychology 36
  • History and Philosophy of Science 83
  • Neurology 101
  • Physiology 158
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 85
Replace Cornelius Borck with:
Cornelius Borck Germany
Allan L. Jacobson United States
Richard Brown United States
Wolfgang Klosterhalfen Germany
Ram Lakhan Pandey Vimal United States
Gregory Bock Austria
Rosa Cao United States
Judith Pascoe United States
Alan H. Harris United States
Philip J. Bersh United States
C. U. M. Smith relative to Cornelius Borck Germany Cornelius Borck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.8×
Cornelius Borck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. U. M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. U. M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. U. M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. U. M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. U. M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. U. M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. U. M. Smith. The network helps show where C. U. M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside C. U. M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. U. M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together C. U. M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199344
2 199334
3 198234
4 200730
5 198226
6
A quantitative analysis of optic nerve axons in elderly control subjects and patients with Alzheimer's disease.
200525
7 199824
8 200620
9 199619
10 198718
11 198717
12 199116
13 197816
14 199413
15 201012
16 197612
17 199611
18 199811
19 19939
20 19939

About C. U. M. Smith

C. U. M. Smith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science, Neurology, Physiology and Philosophy, having authored 62 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (8 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (8 papers), Evolution and Science Education (7 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (36 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (83 citations), Neurology (101 citations), Physiology (158 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (85 citations). C. U. M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard A. Armstrong, N. J. Cairns, Martin N. Rossor, Lincoln C. Wood, Philip J. Luthert, Eugenio Frixione, Stanley Finger, Niels Olson, Panagiotis Matsangas and Nita Lewis Shattuck. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, Journal of the History of Biology, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, Brain and Cognition and Perspectives in biology and medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact