C. Secchi

40 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

C. Secchi
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 128
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 45
  • Animal Science and Zoology 22
  • Spectroscopy 29
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 5
Replace Thomas F. Mowles with:
Thomas F. Mowles United States
A. Berrini Italy
Jens Neunzig Germany
Theodore C. Cree United States
R. F. Palmer United Kingdom
Ernest J. Umberger United States
John G. Brown United Kingdom
George H. Gass United States
Ulrike Harder Germany
Nicolas Liappis Germany
C. Secchi relative to Thomas F. Mowles United States Thomas F. Mowles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Thomas F. Mowles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Secchi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Secchi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Secchi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Secchi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Secchi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Secchi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Secchi. The network helps show where C. Secchi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Secchi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Secchi Line = papers co-authored together C. Secchi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200739
2 200931
3 198826
4 198623
5 197621
6 200720
7
GLC determination of nifedipine, a light sensitive drug, in plasma.
197919
8 197617
9 199415
10 199614
11 197713
12 199613
13 199112
14 199112
15 199311
16 198410
17 19838
18 19998
19 19806
20 19986

About C. Secchi

C. Secchi is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Agronomy and Crop Science, Biochemistry, Analytical Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 41 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (21 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (5 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (3 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (2 papers), Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (2 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Assays (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (128 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (45 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (22 citations), Spectroscopy (29 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (5 citations). C. Secchi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include V. Borromeo, A. Berrini, Pier Antonio Biondi, Fausto Cremonesi, Tatjana Simonic, Maria Teresa Bottero, Alessandra Dalmasso, Tiziana Civera, Francesco Cocola and Eugenio E. Müller. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Research Communications, Theriogenology, Journal of Immunological Methods, Domestic Animal Endocrinology and Chromatographia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact