C. Schulz

801 citations
70 papers · 579 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments 4
    • Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research 3
    • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 6

C. Schulz

64 papers receiving 549 citations

Peers

C. Schulz
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Ophthalmology 114
  • Family Practice 16
  • Neurology 64
  • Pharmaceutical Science 25
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 62
Replace Sara Strauß with:
Sara Strauß United States
Nicholas R. Mahoney United States
Milind V. Kirtane India
Raquel Gutiérrez‐González Spain
Ahmed Sabry Ammar Saudi Arabia
Sareh Said Yekta Germany
Cüneyt Orhan Kara Türkiye
Vijay A. Patel United States
Bruno Splavski Croatia
Peter H. Galloway United Kingdom
C. Schulz relative to Sara Strauß United States Sara Strauß's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Sara Strauß · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Schulz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Schulz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Schulz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Schulz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Schulz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Schulz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Schulz. The network helps show where C. Schulz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Schulz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Schulz Line = papers co-authored together C. Schulz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201264
2 202350
3 201630
4 201430
5 201528
6 201125
7 200023
8 201719
9 201117
10 201116
11 202314
12 201214
13 199813
14 201712
15 201812
16 201111
17 201410
18 201410
19 201310
20 200010

About C. Schulz

C. Schulz is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 70 papers that have together received 579 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (8 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (6 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (4 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (4 papers), Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research (3 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (3 papers) and Meningioma and schwannoma management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (114 citations), Family Practice (16 citations), Neurology (64 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (25 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (62 citations). C. Schulz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Uwe Max Mauer, Ulrich Kunz, Stephan S. Waldeck, P R Hodgkins, Ben Rymer, Mia Moore, Srini Goverdhan, David Hassan, Claire France Smith and Roger C. Humphry. Their work appears in journals such as Eye, Neurosurgical FOCUS, Advances in Orthopedics, Acta Neurochirurgica and Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact