C. Samper

2.0k citations
5 papers · 176 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

C. Samper

5 papers receiving 161 citations

Peers

C. Samper
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Global and Planetary Change 82
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 29
  • Ecological Modeling 8
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 22
  • Ecology 39
Replace Wouter Van Reeth with:
Wouter Van Reeth Belgium
Richard Iovanna United States
Ulrich Hampicke Germany
Claúdia E. Natenzon Argentina
F. R. Veeneklaas Netherlands
Ramesh Prasad Sapkota Nepal
Levente Tímár New Zealand
Yohan Lee South Korea
Chad Settle United States
Kei Sochi United States
C. Samper relative to Wouter Van Reeth Belgium Wouter Van Reeth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Wouter Van Reeth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Samper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Samper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Samper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Samper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Samper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Samper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Samper. The network helps show where C. Samper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Samper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Samper Line = papers co-authored together C. Samper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1
Millenium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being
200584
2
Ecosystems and human well-being: multiscale assessments: findings of the Sub-global Assessments Working Group of the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment
200542
3
Living beyond our means : natural assets and human well-being, statement form the board
200540
4
Biodiversity Synthesis Report
20056
5 19864

About C. Samper

C. Samper is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Plant Science, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 5 papers that have together received 176 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (1 paper), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (1 paper), Zoonotic diseases and public health (1 paper), Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies (1 paper) and Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (82 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (29 citations), Ecological Modeling (8 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (22 citations) and Ecology (39 citations). C. Samper has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include D. Capistrano, Ciara Raudsepp‐Hearne, Robert J. Scholes, Prabhu Pingali, Kanchan Chopra, Rik Leemans, Monika Zurek, H. Simons, Neville Ash and José Sarukhán. Their work appears in journals such as HortScience and Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact