C. S. Ford

3.5k citations
22 papers · 579 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 4
    • Plant tissue culture and regeneration 4
    • Genetically Modified Organisms Research 6

C. S. Ford

22 papers receiving 536 citations

Peers

C. S. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Horticulture 35
  • Plant Science 255
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 125
  • Molecular Biology 343
  • Genetics 119
Replace François Bonnot with:
François Bonnot France
Salvador Montes‐Hernández Mexico
Ronan Rivallan France
Hugo Pacheco de Freitas Fraga Brazil
M.A. Viruel Spain
Shmuel Gazit Israel
M. F. Duval France
Thierry Beulé France
G. Kahl Germany
Marta Matvienko United States
C. S. Ford relative to François Bonnot France François Bonnot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
François Bonnot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. S. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. S. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. S. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. S. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. S. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. S. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. S. Ford. The network helps show where C. S. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. S. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. S. Ford Line = papers co-authored together C. S. Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009247
2 200661
3 201747
4 200645
5 201028
6 200923
7
Technologies for biological containment of GM and Non-GM crops
200523
8 201220
9
Tackling mislabelling in cocoa germplasm collections
200418
10 202011
11 200711
12
Breeding for high productivity lines via haploid technology
20097
13 20126
14 20176
15 19656
16 19755
17 20145
18 19943
19 20232
20
International cocoa germplasm database. ICGD2000, Version 4.1.
20002

About C. S. Ford

C. S. Ford is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Horticulture, Ecology and Genetics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 579 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetically Modified Organisms Research (6 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (4 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (4 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (4 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers), Oil Palm Production and Sustainability (2 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers) and Plant and animal studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (35 citations), Plant Science (255 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (125 citations), Molecular Biology (343 citations) and Genetics (119 citations). C. S. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Chile. Frequent co-authors include M. J. Wilkinson, J. Allainguillaume, Mark W. Chase, Niklas Wikström, Peter M. Hollingsworth, Robyn S. Cowan, Nadia Haider, Laura J. Kelly, Karen L. Ayres and R. Joel Duff. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, New Phytologist, BMC Plant Biology, Annals of Applied Biology and The American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact