C. Pohl

658 citations
16 papers · 548 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

C. Pohl

16 papers receiving 517 citations

Peers

C. Pohl
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 243
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 175
  • Neurology 56
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 64
  • Reproductive Medicine 24
Replace Keiko Matsuoka with:
Keiko Matsuoka Japan
Sean Tobyne United States
Fernando Mulas Spain
S. Vesterhauge Denmark
Aimen Kasasbeh United States
Ferenc Nagy Hungary
Serge Chassagnon France
Joseph U. Toglia United States
Emily C. Maxwell United States
Tina Banks United Kingdom
C. Pohl relative to Keiko Matsuoka Japan Keiko Matsuoka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Keiko Matsuoka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Pohl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Pohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Pohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Pohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Pohl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Pohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Pohl. The network helps show where C. Pohl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Pohl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Pohl Line = papers co-authored together C. Pohl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1991165
2 200785
3 199569
4 200660
5 200637
6 198233
7 200726
8 198021
9 198612
10 197811
11 202210
12 20256
13 19876
14 20233
15 20143
16 19951

About C. Pohl

C. Pohl is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Mechanics of Materials and Surgery, having authored 16 papers that have together received 548 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Behavior of Composites (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Structural Response to Dynamic Loads (2 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (2 papers), High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (2 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (2 papers) and Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (243 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (175 citations), Neurology (56 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (64 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (24 citations). C. Pohl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Christoph Helmstaedter, Christian E. Elger, A. Hufnagel, Janine Diehl‐Schmid, Anthony J. Zeleznik, Robert Perneczky, Alexander Kurz, Hans Förstl, Stefan Wagenpfeil and Andrea Kurz. Their work appears in journals such as Cortex, Composite Structures, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, Composites Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing and Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact