C. Pivot

51 papers receiving 543 citations

Peers

C. Pivot
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Occupational Therapy 46
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 35
  • Chemical Health and Safety 5
  • Pharmaceutical Science 42
  • Hematology 71
Replace Hitesh C Pandya with:
Hitesh C Pandya United Kingdom
Stéphanie Genay France
Sarah Mousavi Iran
James G. Dahlgren United States
Mohammed Nasir Al-Arifi Saudi Arabia
Lidwien M. Hanff Netherlands
Janet L. Fox United States
Hester Magdalena Oberholzer South Africa
Sarita Bajaj India
Dieter Genser Austria
C. Pivot relative to Hitesh C Pandya United Kingdom Hitesh C Pandya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Hitesh C Pandya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Pivot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Pivot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Pivot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Pivot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Pivot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Pivot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Pivot. The network helps show where C. Pivot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Pivot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Pivot Line = papers co-authored together C. Pivot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201287
2 201147
3 201545
4 202237
5 201330
6 201727
7 201524
8 201218
9 201815
10 201215
11 202115
12
[Effectiveness of combined vancomycin and pefloxacine in gastrointestinal decontamination for preventing infections after chemotherapy-induced bone marrow aplasia. A randomized double-blind study].
200014
13 201013
14 201712
15 201811
16 201911
17 201510
18 201010
19 201510
20 20149

About C. Pivot

C. Pivot is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Occupational Therapy, Hematology, Rheumatology and Genetics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs (6 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (6 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (4 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (4 papers), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (4 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (3 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (3 papers) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (46 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (35 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (5 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (42 citations) and Hematology (71 citations). C. Pivot has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Fabrice Pirot, Yves Perrodin, Julien Jean, Marie Perraud, Évelyne Decullier, A. Janoly-Duménil, Fabrice Pirot, Guillaume Galy, Céline Vignault and Gilles Paintaud. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Blood, Journal of Infusion Nursing and Annales Pharmaceutiques Françaises.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact