C. Piller

736 citations
47 papers · 369 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

C. Piller

45 papers receiving 355 citations

Peers

C. Piller
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 205
  • Aerospace Engineering 167
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 162
  • Mechanics of Materials 125
  • Radiation 42
Replace R. Jacot‐Guillarmod with:
R. Jacot‐Guillarmod Switzerland
V. Yu. Sergeev Russia
S. V. Murakhtin Russia
S. Korepanov United States
G. Mazzitelli Italy
K. Nakahara Japan
U. Gendotti Switzerland
M. Olivo Canada
M. Goldman United States
T. H. Hisakado United States
C. Piller relative to R. Jacot‐Guillarmod Switzerland R. Jacot‐Guillarmod's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
R. Jacot‐Guillarmod · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Piller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Piller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Piller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Piller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Piller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Piller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Piller. The network helps show where C. Piller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Piller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Piller Line = papers co-authored together C. Piller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199234
2 198830
3 198830
4 199029
5 199219
6 201218
7 201417
8 199016
9 198815
10 201514
11 198713
12 19979
13 20168
14 20157
15 20217
16 19897
17 19897
18 20156
19 20116
20 20026

About C. Piller

C. Piller is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 47 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (32 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (14 papers), Muon and positron interactions and applications (13 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (12 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (12 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (11 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (6 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (205 citations), Aerospace Engineering (167 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (162 citations), Mechanics of Materials (125 citations) and Radiation (42 citations). C. Piller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Poland. Frequent co-authors include R. Jacot‐Guillarmod, L. Schellenberg, H. Schneuwly, L. A. Schaller, M. P. Stöckli, R. F. Welton, T. R. Pennisi, G. Royer, M. Santana and Baoxi Han. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Scientific Instruments, Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics, Journal of Instrumentation, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact