C Peca

452 citations
17 papers · 344 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment 6
    • Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications 3

C Peca

17 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers

C Peca
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Genetics 75
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 112
  • Neurology 69
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 68
  • Otorhinolaryngology 11
Replace Yasuo Sasagawa with:
Yasuo Sasagawa Japan
Jason Sheehan United States
Ra Gyoung Yoon South Korea
Dominique Doyon France
Miriam da Costa Oliveira Brazil
Mazda K. Turel India
Pedro Riesgo Spain
Ye Gu China
Carolina Garcia Soares Leães Brazil
Jean-François Bonneville France
C Peca relative to Yasuo Sasagawa Japan Yasuo Sasagawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Yasuo Sasagawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C Peca

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C Peca's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C Peca with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C Peca more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C Peca

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C Peca. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C Peca. The network helps show where C Peca may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C Peca, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C Peca Line = papers co-authored together C Peca links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200098
2 200851
3 200131
4 201128
5 198828
6
Percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizolysis for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Technique and results in 191 patients.
199525
7 201618
8 201314
9 202013
10 19888
11 20057
12 20147
13 20086
14 20155
15 20192
16
Percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizolysis. Observations and results about 50 cases.
19882
17 20221

About C Peca

C Peca is a scholar working on Genetics, Neurology, Epidemiology, Surgery and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (5 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (3 papers), Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (3 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (3 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (2 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (2 papers) and Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (75 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (112 citations), Neurology (69 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (68 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (11 citations). C Peca has collaborated with scholars based in Italy. Frequent co-authors include Paolo Cappabianca, Enrico de Divitiis, Francesco Maiuri, Marialaura Del Basso De, Luigi Maria Cavallo, Giuseppe Mariniello, Renato Spaziante, Annamaria Colao, Matthew R. Fusco and Giuseppe Lombardi. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgery, min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuropathology, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery and Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact