C. Max Schmidt
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Keith D. Lillemoe (30 shared papers)Nicholas J. Zyromski (90 shared papers)Attila Nakeeb (83 shared papers)Martha B. Pitman (7 shared papers)Henry A. Pitt (27 shared papers)Michele Yip-Schneider (58 shared papers)Michael G. House (84 shared papers)John M. DeWitt (36 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery (39 papers)Surgery (17 papers)The American Journal of Surgery (15 papers)HPB (15 papers)Journal of Surgical Research (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyTürkiye
In The Last Decade
C. Max Schmidt
239 papers receiving 10.0k citations
C. Max Schmidt's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Oncology 6.6k
- Surgery 3.3k
- Cancer Research 867
- Epidemiology 1.3k
- Gastroenterology 168
Countries citing papers authored by C. Max Schmidt
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Max Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Max Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Max Schmidt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Max Schmidt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Max Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Max Schmidt. The network helps show where C. Max Schmidt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Max Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 250 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 1560 |
| 2 | Recurrent GNAS Mutations Define an Unexpected Pathway for Pancreatic Cyst Development Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 567 |
| 3 | 2010 | 327 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 325 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 323 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 294 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 260 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 210 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 180 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 179 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 177 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 175 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 162 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 160 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 159 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 156 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 134 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 115 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 113 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 100 |
About C. Max Schmidt
C. Max Schmidt is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research and Epidemiology, having authored 250 papers that have together received 10.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (118 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (58 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (13 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (10 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (8 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (7 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (7 papers) and Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (6.6k citations), Surgery (3.3k citations), Cancer Research (867 citations), Epidemiology (1.3k citations) and Gastroenterology (168 citations). C. Max Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Keith D. Lillemoe, Nicholas J. Zyromski, Attila Nakeeb, Martha B. Pitman, Henry A. Pitt, Michele Yip-Schneider, Michael G. House, John M. DeWitt, Christopher L. Wolfgang and Eugene P. Ceppa. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Surgery, The American Journal of Surgery, HPB and Journal of Surgical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.