C Mark Harper

19 papers receiving 544 citations

Peers

C Mark Harper
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 113
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 42
  • Rehabilitation 33
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 60
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 16
Replace Luiz Eugênio Garcez Leme with:
Luiz Eugênio Garcez Leme Brazil
Anthony Kehoe United Kingdom
Rodrigo Núñez‐Cortés Chile
Pertti Karppi Finland
Robert W. Hopkins United States
Gianluigi Balestroni Italy
Timothy I. Standish Canada
Vanessa Resqueti Brazil
Maryanne Bailey United States
Pi‐Chu Lin Taiwan
C Mark Harper relative to Luiz Eugênio Garcez Leme Brazil Luiz Eugênio Garcez Leme's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Luiz Eugênio Garcez Leme · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C Mark Harper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C Mark Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C Mark Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C Mark Harper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C Mark Harper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C Mark Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C Mark Harper. The network helps show where C Mark Harper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C Mark Harper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C Mark Harper Line = papers co-authored together C Mark Harper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988273
2 201864
3 201660
4 200452
5 200527
6 202221
7 202121
8 201417
9 201910
10 201210
11 20244
12 20214
13 20083
14 20251
15 20161
16 20251
17 20031
18 20091
19 19861
20 20240

About C Mark Harper

C Mark Harper is a scholar working on Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 572 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thermal Regulation in Medicine (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (2 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (2 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (113 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (42 citations), Rehabilitation (33 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (60 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (16 citations). C Mark Harper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and United States. Frequent co-authors include Heather Massey, Mike Tipton, G. Edge, Gareth Ambler, Christoffer van Tulleken, David Crook, Paul Gorczynski, Ala Yankouskaya, Stephen Bremner and Christopher I. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Clinical Neurophysiology, Mental health and physical activity, Journal of Affective Disorders and Journal of Hospital Infection.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact