C. Krafft

1.5k citations
106 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

C. Krafft

103 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

C. Krafft
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 921
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 471
  • Geophysics 129
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 8
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 209
Replace Shan Wang with:
Shan Wang United States
Frank Eisenhauer Germany
D. Tsiklauri United Kingdom
M. Evans United States
C. Straubmeier Germany
Gelu M. Nita United States
Bengt Lundborg Sweden
N. Zacharias United States
Ammar Hakim United States
A. Jameson Australia
C. Krafft relative to Shan Wang United States Shan Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Shan Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Krafft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Krafft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Krafft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Krafft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Krafft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Krafft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Krafft. The network helps show where C. Krafft may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Krafft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Krafft Line = papers co-authored together C. Krafft links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 106 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199982
2 201351
3 199446
4 201539
5 199429
6 201428
7 200425
8
TITAN: a traffic measurement system using image processing techniques
198925
9 199924
10 199924
11 201223
12 199922
13 200322
14 199522
15 199821
16 201920
17 201620
18 200620
19 200618
20 199718

About C. Krafft

C. Krafft is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Geophysics, having authored 106 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (90 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (66 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (57 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (12 papers), Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena (11 papers), Earthquake Detection and Analysis (11 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (8 papers) and Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (921 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (471 citations), Geophysics (129 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (8 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (209 citations). C. Krafft has collaborated with scholars based in France, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include A. S. Volokitin, G. Matthieussent, M. Starodubtsev, V. Krasnoselskikh, Philippe Savoini, P. Thévenet, H. Kochan, P. Ehrenfreund, V. Pirronello and T. M. Zaboronkova. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, The Astrophysical Journal, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, Journal of Plasma Physics and Annales Geophysicae.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact