C. Hodes

410 citations
17 papers · 313 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

C. Hodes

14 papers receiving 249 citations

Peers

C. Hodes
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Ophthalmology 156
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 101
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Neurology 34
  • Nephrology 13
Replace Almou Ibrahim with:
Almou Ibrahim United States
Petch Rawdaree Thailand
Mary H. Brown United States
Flora López‐Simarro Spain
Masahiro Ishizawa Japan
Kazuya Fujihara Japan
C Valerio Italy
M S Hammersley United Kingdom
DJS Fernando Sri Lanka
D. Cavaliere Italy
C. Hodes relative to Almou Ibrahim United States Almou Ibrahim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Almou Ibrahim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Hodes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Hodes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Hodes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Hodes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Hodes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Hodes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Hodes. The network helps show where C. Hodes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside C. Hodes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Hodes Line = papers co-authored together C. Hodes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1975160
2 197644
3 197524
4 197622
5 196816
6
Geriatric screening and care in group practice.
197111
7
The structure and function of a file of patient health data in general practice.
19689
8
Seek Wisely to Prevent
19746
9
High blood pressure: public views and knowledge.
19794
10
The computer and screening techniques in general practice.
19693
11
Cervical screening--refusal in general practice.
19723
12
High blood pressure and psychiatric disorder in general practice.
19763
13 19733
14 19762
15
Enuresis--a study in general practice.
19732
16
Low dosage Trifluoperazine (Stelazine) in General Practice.
19601
17 19680

About C. Hodes

C. Hodes is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Pharmacology, Dermatology and Neurology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Coding and Health Information (1 paper), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (1 paper), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1 paper), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (1 paper), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (1 paper), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (1 paper) and Electronic Health Records Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (156 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (101 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation), Neurology (34 citations) and Nephrology (13 citations). C. Hodes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include M G Everitt, C J Bulpitt, Pauline Rogers, Arnold Bloom, Christopher J. Bulpitt, Kenneth Shaw and Maureen O’Brien. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, BMJ and PubMed Central.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact