C. Gateley

33 papers receiving 664 citations

Peers

C. Gateley
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 293
  • Dermatology 143
  • Cancer Research 200
  • Microbiology 8
  • Pharmaceutical Science 62
Replace Abdullateef A. Alzolibani with:
Abdullateef A. Alzolibani Saudi Arabia
Dagmar Wilsmann‐Theis Germany
Jordan C. Stern United States
Richard Parslew United Kingdom
Lixiang Yu China
Elena Niculeț Romania
Mei Lin China
Noel S. Weiss United States
Marco Galluzzo Italy
Hui‐Chun Hsu Taiwan
C. Gateley relative to Abdullateef A. Alzolibani Saudi Arabia Abdullateef A. Alzolibani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.8×
Abdullateef A. Alzolibani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Gateley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Gateley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Gateley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Gateley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Gateley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Gateley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Gateley. The network helps show where C. Gateley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Gateley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Gateley Line = papers co-authored together C. Gateley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200489
2 199284
3 199864
4 201247
5
Replace fine needle aspiration cytology with automated core biopsy in the triple assessment of breast cancer.
200146
6 199244
7 200437
8 199336
9 200935
10 199435
11 200531
12
Management of cyclical breast pain.
199026
13 200622
14 199022
15 199121
16 199120
17 201614
18 201513
19 199711
20 201710

About C. Gateley

C. Gateley is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research, Dermatology, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 758 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (20 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (15 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (10 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (3 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers) and Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (293 citations), Dermatology (143 citations), Cancer Research (200 citations), Microbiology (8 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (62 citations). C. Gateley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ludger Barthelmes, R E Mansel, Margaret Miers, R.E. Mansel, L E Hughes, Dayalan Clarke, Sion Coulman, James C. Birchall, Christopher P. Twine and A. Anstey. Their work appears in journals such as The Breast, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, British journal of surgery, Journal of Investigative Dermatology and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact