C. Garforth
Impact in
-
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Rural development and sustainability
- Small Animals top 5%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Helminth infection and control
Papers in
-
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices 5
- Agricultural Economics and Policy 4
- Rural development and sustainability 2
-
- Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology 2
- Co-authors
- Gwyn E. Jones (1 shared paper)T. Rehman (6 shared papers)K. McKemey (5 shared papers)C. M. Yates (3 shared papers)John Archer (1 shared paper)Peter Oakley (1 shared paper)Richard Tranter (2 shared papers)Richard J. Cooke (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension (1 paper)Zoonoses and Public Health (1 paper)Veterinary Record (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
C. Garforth
23 papers receiving 354 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 157
- Small Animals 93
- Business and International Management 20
- Agronomy and Crop Science 85
- Equine 9
Countries citing papers authored by C. Garforth
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Garforth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Garforth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Garforth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Garforth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Garforth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Garforth. The network helps show where C. Garforth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Garforth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 126 | |
| 2 | The history, development, and future of agricultural extension | 1997 | 82 |
| 3 | Improving the design of knowledge transfer strategies by understanding farmer attitudes and behaviours | 2003 | 47 |
| 4 | Improving farmers' access to advice on land management: Lessons from case studies in developed countries. | 2003 | 28 |
| 5 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 6 | Research to understand and model the behaviour and motivations of farmers in responding to policy changes (England). | 2006 | 24 |
| 7 | Communication research to support knowledge interventions in agricultural development: case studies from Eritrea and Uganda. | 2003 | 15 |
| 8 | Farmers’ behavioural inclinations and their influence on the anticipated response to the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy in England | 2007 | 13 |
| 9 | Guide to Extension Training | 2018 | 11 |
| 10 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 12 | Scaling-up of sustainable soil management practices: Case studies of Panchakhal and Sanga villages in Kavre district, Nepal. | 2002 | 6 |
| 13 | Four-cell analysis as a decision-making tool for conservation of agrobiodiversity on-farm. | 2005 | 5 |
| 14 | Livestock farmers' attitudes towards consequential loss insurance against notifiable diseases (Final report of a research study commissioned by the Livestock Strategy Division of the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). | 2005 | 4 |
| 15 | Lessons learnt on scaling-up from case studies in Bolivia, Nepal and Uganda. | 2002 | 4 |
| 16 | Improving the targeting of knowledge and technology transfer in the livestock sector by understanding farmer attitudes to behaviour. | 2003 | 3 |
| 17 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 18 | Diseases affecting cattle in the peri-urban regions of Pondicherry, India: report based on stakeholder's meetings. | 2003 | 2 |
| 19 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 2 |
About C. Garforth
C. Garforth is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Agronomy and Crop Science, Small Animals, Political Science and International Relations and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural Innovations and Practices (5 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (4 papers), Rural development and sustainability (2 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (2 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (2 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (2 papers), African history and culture analysis (2 papers) and Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (157 citations), Small Animals (93 citations), Business and International Management (20 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (85 citations) and Equine (9 citations). C. Garforth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gwyn E. Jones, T. Rehman, K. McKemey, C. M. Yates, John Archer, Peter Oakley, Richard Tranter, Richard J. Cooke, Kelly C. Allison and A.J. Wilsmore. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, Zoonoses and Public Health, Veterinary Record, Medical Entomology and Zoology and OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.