C. E. Chase

1.2k citations
41 papers · 925 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

C. E. Chase

39 papers receiving 802 citations

Peers

C. E. Chase
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 612
  • Condensed Matter Physics 105
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 102
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 7
  • Geophysics 97
Replace K. R. Atkins with:
K. R. Atkins United States
E.F. Hammel United States
James C. Rainwater United States
Richard F. Wallis United States
D. M. Gass United States
P. P. J. M. Schram Netherlands
J. T. Tough United States
K.W. Taconis Netherlands
Dwain E. Diller United States
J. W. Beams United States
C. E. Chase relative to K. R. Atkins United States K. R. Atkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
K. R. Atkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. E. Chase

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. E. Chase's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. E. Chase with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. E. Chase more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. E. Chase

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. E. Chase. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. E. Chase. The network helps show where C. E. Chase may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside C. E. Chase, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. E. Chase Line = papers co-authored together C. E. Chase links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1964125
2 195866
3 196258
4 195849
5 196148
6 196346
7 197145
8 196744
9 195142
10 195339
11 196333
12 196231
13 195529
14 196426
15 196326
16 197222
17 197121
18 196721
19 196520
20 195917

About C. E. Chase

C. E. Chase is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 41 papers that have together received 925 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (26 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (11 papers), Advanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines (6 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (5 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (5 papers), Laser Design and Applications (5 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (4 papers) and Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (612 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (105 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (102 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (7 citations) and Geophysics (97 citations). C. E. Chase has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. Blitz, W. M. Whitney, E. Maxwell, George O. Zimmerman, B. Lax, K. R. Atkins, Laszlo Tisza, R.C. Williamson, Fielding Brown and R. L. Aggarwal. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Review of Scientific Instruments, Applied Physics Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics and IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact