E.F. Hammel

1.2k citations
47 papers · 815 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

E.F. Hammel

43 papers receiving 744 citations

Peers

E.F. Hammel
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Condensed Matter Physics 206
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 529
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 98
  • Aerospace Engineering 189
  • Geophysics 84
Replace K.W. Taconis with:
K.W. Taconis Netherlands
Thomas Roberts United States
K. R. Atkins United States
S. G. Sydoriak United States
Pat R. Roach United States
R. de Bruyn Ouboter Netherlands
A. L. Thomson United Kingdom
P. J. Bendt United States
M. Kuchnir United States
O. Avenel France
E.F. Hammel relative to K.W. Taconis Netherlands K.W. Taconis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
K.W. Taconis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E.F. Hammel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.F. Hammel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.F. Hammel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.F. Hammel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.F. Hammel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.F. Hammel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.F. Hammel. The network helps show where E.F. Hammel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E.F. Hammel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E.F. Hammel Line = papers co-authored together E.F. Hammel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974205
2 1954108
3 195598
4 198251
5 196242
6 196636
7 196036
8 195627
9 195715
10 196615
11 197015
12 196514
13 196114
14 196313
15 196413
16 195513
17 196612
18 19529
19 19669
20 19659

About E.F. Hammel

E.F. Hammel is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Geophysics and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 815 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (22 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (11 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (9 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (8 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (8 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (6 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (206 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (529 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (98 citations), Aerospace Engineering (189 citations) and Geophysics (84 citations). E.F. Hammel has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include W. Keller, K.D. Timmerhaus, W.J. O’Sullivan, John E. Kilpatrick, N. Metropolis, F.J. Edeskuty, R.H. Sherman, H.L. Laquer, A. F. Schuch and C. J. Hoffman. Their work appears in journals such as Cryogenics, Physical Review Letters, Review of Scientific Instruments, Annals of Physics and Physics Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact