C. D. Broad

2.8k citations
37 papers · 675 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

C. D. Broad

29 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

C. D. Broad
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • History and Philosophy of Science 145
  • General Psychology 36
  • Philosophy 286
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 125
  • Theoretical Computer Science 12
Replace Eugen Fink with:
Eugen Fink Germany
Martín Steinmann Liechtenstein
Friedrich Kaulbach
J. O. Urmson United Kingdom
J. M. Bocheński Poland
Wiebke Schrader
David Pears United Kingdom
Wolfgang Schwarz Germany
Rudolph Berlinger
Patrick K Bastable
C. D. Broad relative to Eugen Fink Germany Eugen Fink's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Eugen Fink · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. D. Broad

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. D. Broad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. D. Broad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. D. Broad more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. D. Broad

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. D. Broad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. D. Broad. The network helps show where C. D. Broad may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside C. D. Broad, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. D. Broad Line = papers co-authored together C. D. Broad links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985143
2 195373
3
Broad's critical essays in moral philosophy
197167
4 195455
5 195451
6 195449
7 195442
8 196233
9
Kant, An Introduction
197829
10 196529
11 195222
12 196814
13 19689
14 19689
15 19688
16
Scientific Thought: A Philosophical Analysis of some of its fundamental concepts
20016
17 19684
18 19513
19
Religion, Philosophy and Psychical Research: Selected Essays
20003
20 19513

About C. D. Broad

C. D. Broad is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 37 papers that have together received 675 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (145 citations), General Psychology (36 citations), Philosophy (286 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (125 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (12 citations). C. D. Broad has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include H. J. Paton, C. J. Ducasse, Karl Olivecrona, Barna Horvath, Albert A. Ehrenzweig and Edwin N. Garlan. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophy, The Philosophical Review, Mind and Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact