C. Chandré

2.1k citations
130 papers · 1.6k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

C. Chandré

124 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

C. Chandré
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 452
  • Mathematical Physics 321
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 726
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 237
  • Applied Mathematics 96
Replace Giovanni Ortenzi with:
Giovanni Ortenzi Italy
Eugène R. Speer United States
Kevin Mitchell United States
Yves Elskens France
Matthew J. Davis Australia
E. Infeld Poland
Julien Barré France
Luis Miguel Nieto Spain
Jan Myrheim Norway
Pavel I. Etingof United States
C. Chandré relative to Giovanni Ortenzi Italy Giovanni Ortenzi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Giovanni Ortenzi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Chandré

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Chandré's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Chandré with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Chandré more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Chandré

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Chandré. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Chandré. The network helps show where C. Chandré may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Chandré, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Chandré Line = papers co-authored together C. Chandré links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 130 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010154
2 2003121
3 200969
4 201357
5 200852
6 200548
7 201040
8 202240
9 200437
10 200235
11 201426
12 201324
13 199723
14 199823
15 202223
16 200521
17 200821
18 200921
19 200420
20 201420

About C. Chandré

C. Chandré is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Mathematical Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 130 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (35 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (33 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (26 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (25 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (18 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (12 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (11 papers) and Fusion and Plasma Physics Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (452 citations), Mathematical Physics (321 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (726 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (237 citations) and Applied Mathematics (96 citations). C. Chandré has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include T. Uzer, François Mauger, Hans Rudolf Jauslin, Stephen Wiggins, E. Tassi, Michel Vittot, Guido Ciraolo, Ricardo Lima, Xavier Leoncini and Romain Bachelard. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A, Physics of Plasmas, Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical and Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact