C. Chandré

94 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

C. Chandré
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 429
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 250
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 596
  • Spectroscopy 230
  • Mathematical Physics 72
Replace Harald Friedrich with:
Harald Friedrich Germany
L. Kaplan United States
C. Rangacharyulu Germany
Sudhir R. Jain India
Karl-Erik Thylwe Sweden
A. Wirzba Germany
Nicolas Pavloff France
E. S. Hernández Argentina
R. Giachetti Italy
Hai-Woong Lee South Korea
C. Chandré relative to Harald Friedrich Germany Harald Friedrich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Harald Friedrich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Chandré

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Chandré's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Chandré with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Chandré more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Chandré

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Chandré. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Chandré. The network helps show where C. Chandré may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Chandré, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Chandré Line = papers co-authored together C. Chandré links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 103 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010145
2 200960
3 201355
4 200846
5 200541
6 201038
7 200233
8 200430
9 201424
10 199722
11 202221
12 199820
13 200918
14 199818
15
Control of stochasticity in magnetic field lines
200517
16 200817
17 201216
18 200616
19 200416
20 200815

About C. Chandré

C. Chandré is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Computer Networks and Communications and Spectroscopy, having authored 103 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (48 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (34 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (20 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (19 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (16 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (14 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (12 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (429 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (250 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (596 citations), Spectroscopy (230 citations) and Mathematical Physics (72 citations). C. Chandré has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include T. Uzer, François Mauger, H. R. Jauslin, Michel Vittot, Ricardo Lima, Xavier Leoncini, Giuseppe Ciraolo, Romain Bachelard, E. Tassi and Duccio Fanelli. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. A, Physical Review A, Physics Letters A and Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact