C. Beck

2.7k citations
89 papers · 1.5k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

C. Beck

80 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

C. Beck
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.3k
  • Artificial Intelligence 266
  • Instrumentation 26
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 155
  • Oceanography 52
Replace C. D. Pike with:
C. D. Pike United Kingdom
D. H. Mackay United Kingdom
E. Khomenko Spain
S. R. Habbal United States
Hirohisa Hara Japan
Janet Machol United States
Leping Li China
B. N. Dwivedi India
P. F. Chen China
Amy R. Winebarger United States
C. Beck relative to C. D. Pike United Kingdom C. D. Pike's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
C. D. Pike · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Beck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Beck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Beck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Beck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Beck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Beck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Beck. The network helps show where C. Beck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Beck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Beck Line = papers co-authored together C. Beck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200583
2 201870
3 200562
4 200757
5 200754
6 199953
7 200543
8 202242
9 200940
10 201136
11 200835
12 201434
13 200733
14 201533
15 200932
16 201232
17 200532
18 201130
19 200530
20 200330

About C. Beck

C. Beck is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 89 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (73 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (47 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (29 papers), Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics (18 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (12 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (8 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (7 papers) and Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.3k citations), Artificial Intelligence (266 citations), Instrumentation (26 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (155 citations) and Oceanography (52 citations). C. Beck has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include R. Rezaei, L. R. Bellot Rubio, W. Schmidt, R. Schlichenmaier, T. Kentischer, K. G. Puschmann, D. Elmore, W. Härtl, Rohan E. Louis and M. Collados. Their work appears in journals such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Astrophysical Journal, Solar Physics, Icarus and Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact