BW Mol
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Ovarian function and disorders
Papers in
-
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies 4
- Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions 4
- Gestational Diabetes Research and Management 1
-
- Maternal and fetal healthcare 2
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy 2
BW Mol
15 papers receiving 642 citations
BW Mol's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 139
- Reproductive Medicine 156
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 124
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 105
- Emergency Medicine 26
Countries citing papers authored by BW Mol
This map shows the geographic impact of BW Mol's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by BW Mol with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BW Mol more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by BW Mol
This network shows the impact of papers produced by BW Mol. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by BW Mol. The network helps show where BW Mol may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside BW Mol, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Epidemiology of infertility in China: a population‐based study Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 283 |
| 2 | 2012 | 104 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 79 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 15 | Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) findings | 2012 | 1 |
| 16 | 2011 | 0 |
About BW Mol
BW Mol is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery, Reproductive Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (4 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (2 papers), Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper) and Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (139 citations), Reproductive Medicine (156 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (124 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (105 citations) and Emergency Medicine (26 citations). BW Mol has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey A. Keelan, Jie Qiao, Danni Zheng, Raymond Li, Yimin Zhu, Yuefan Kang, Yunxia Cao, Hongping Wu, Zehong Zhou and Saskia Houterman. Their work appears in journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.