Brian Tew

55 papers receiving 676 citations

Peers

Brian Tew
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 127
  • Finance 129
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 198
  • Clinical Psychology 204
  • Development 28
Replace Robert C. Hanson with:
Robert C. Hanson United States
Jeremy Alden United Kingdom
Richard M. Abrams United States
Janet Morrison United States
David Nicholls New Zealand
Beth Fischer United States
Silke Schicktanz Germany
Roberto Andorno Switzerland
Ken Fogelman United Kingdom
P. Dorian Owen New Zealand
Brian Tew relative to Robert C. Hanson United States Robert C. Hanson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Robert C. Hanson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Tew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Tew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Tew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Tew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Tew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Tew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Tew. The network helps show where Brian Tew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian Tew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Tew Line = papers co-authored together Brian Tew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973131
2 1957103
3 197576
4 197969
5 197554
6 195546
7 195331
8 196827
9 197427
10 195322
11 195420
12
Current concepts in spina bifida and hydrocephalus
199119
13 195718
14 195318
15 197717
16 198516
17 196015
18 195714
19 197814
20 195413

About Brian Tew

Brian Tew is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Surgery, having authored 65 papers that have together received 919 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (15 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (5 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (3 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (2 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (127 citations), Finance (129 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (198 citations), Clinical Psychology (204 citations) and Development (28 citations). Brian Tew has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include K. M. Laurence, Richard Ν. Gardner, R. M. Hartwell, R. S. Sayers, Carys M. Bannister, Prasanna Samuel, Philip W. Bell, John Williamson, W. Braddock Hickman and Richard J. Sweeney. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic Journal, Economica, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, The Economic History Review and Child Care Health and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact