Brian Mathew

849 citations
67 papers · 669 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Brian Mathew

60 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers

Brian Mathew
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 269
  • Plant Science 408
  • Oncology 189
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 31
  • Pharmacology 27
Replace Shengdan Wu with:
Shengdan Wu China
Lucie Vaníčková Czechia
Enze Li China
Kun‐Li Xiang China
Timothy C. Morton United States
Pei‐Liang Liu China
Ladislav Malek Canada
A Atanasov Bulgaria
Susanna Flavia Boxall United Kingdom
Brian Mathew relative to Shengdan Wu China Shengdan Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×37.8×
Shengdan Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Mathew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Mathew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Mathew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Mathew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Mathew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Mathew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Mathew. The network helps show where Brian Mathew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian Mathew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Mathew Line = papers co-authored together Brian Mathew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The crocus : a revision of the genus crocus (iridaceae)
1982100
2 200071
3 197758
4
A review of Allium Section Allium.
199643
5 199737
6 200035
7 199028
8 199122
9 197822
10 199420
11 198518
12 198615
13 202213
14 198812
15 199212
16 202311
17 198310
18 199510
19 19759
20
SOME ASPECTS OF THE 'JUNO GROUP' OF IRISES
20009

About Brian Mathew

Brian Mathew is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Neurology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 669 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies (15 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (13 papers), Saffron Plant Research Studies (12 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (11 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (9 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (9 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (7 papers) and Plant and animal studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (269 citations), Plant Science (408 citations), Oncology (189 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (31 citations) and Pharmacology (27 citations). Brian Mathew has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Adel Jalili, Paula J. Rudall, James M. Bradeen, Neriman Özhatay, C. A. Brighton, C. Grey-Wilson, Margaret A. T. Johnson, Christopher Brickell, Oleg Polunin and Jeffrey B. Harborne. Their work appears in journals such as Kew Bulletin, Plant Systematics and Evolution, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Phytochemistry and Frontiers in Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact