Brian Mathew

871 citations
70 papers · 728 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Brian Mathew

61 papers receiving 599 citations

Peers

Brian Mathew
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 279
  • Plant Science 429
  • Oncology 206
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 31
  • Biochemistry 20
Replace Baode Wang with:
Baode Wang China
Christian Puff Austria
Raymond S. Tangney New Zealand
J.W.G.M. Wilmer Netherlands
Lucie Vaníčková Czechia
Takuji Hoshino Japan
S. Bouzid Tunisia
Mauro Braga França Brazil
Ladislav Malek Canada
Brian Mathew relative to Baode Wang China Baode Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13.7×
Baode Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Mathew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Mathew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Mathew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Mathew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Mathew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Mathew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Mathew. The network helps show where Brian Mathew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian Mathew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Mathew Line = papers co-authored together Brian Mathew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The crocus : a revision of the genus crocus (iridaceae)
1982112
2 200072
3 197763
4
A review of Allium Section Allium.
199646
5 199746
6 200037
7 199029
8 197823
9 199122
10 199422
11 198518
12 198616
13 198816
14 202314
15 202213
16 198312
17 199212
18
A reassessment of Crocus based on molecular analysis
200911
19 199511
20
SOME ASPECTS OF THE 'JUNO GROUP' OF IRISES
200010

About Brian Mathew

Brian Mathew is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Oncology, Molecular Biology and Neurology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 728 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies (15 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (14 papers), Saffron Plant Research Studies (12 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (12 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (9 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (9 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (7 papers) and Plant and animal studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (279 citations), Plant Science (429 citations), Oncology (206 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (31 citations) and Biochemistry (20 citations). Brian Mathew has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Adel Jalili, James M. Bradeen, Paula J. Rudall, Neriman Özhatay, C. A. Brighton, Christopher Grey-Wilson, Christopher Brickell, Margaret A. T. Johnson, Oleg Polunin and Christine A. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Kew Bulletin, Epilepsia, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Plant Systematics and Evolution and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact