Boy Høyer

722 citations
21 papers · 670 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Boy Høyer

21 papers receiving 609 citations

Peers

Boy Høyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Electrochemistry 506
  • Bioengineering 412
  • Analytical Chemistry 66
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 381
  • Polymers and Plastics 85
Replace Agnieszka Królicka with:
Agnieszka Królicka Poland
Ciprian Radovan Romania
Zaofan Zhao China
Suchada Chuanuwatanakul Thailand
Y. Bonfil Israel
Christian Neuhold Austria
Ivanildo Luiz de Mattos Brazil
Cecylia Wardak Poland
S. Jayarama Reddy India
Antônio de Santana Santos Brazil
Boy Høyer relative to Agnieszka Królicka Poland Agnieszka Królicka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Agnieszka Królicka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Boy Høyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Boy Høyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Boy Høyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Boy Høyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Boy Høyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Boy Høyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Boy Høyer. The network helps show where Boy Høyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Boy Høyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Boy Høyer Line = papers co-authored together Boy Høyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987215
2 1987121
3 199662
4 200641
5 200333
6 199429
7 200424
8 200518
9 200118
10 198816
11 200314
12 200611
13 199111
14 199311
15 200011
16 198510
17 19997
18 19866
19 19965
20 19924

About Boy Høyer

Boy Høyer is a scholar working on Bioengineering, Electrochemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Polymers and Plastics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 670 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (18 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (16 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (6 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (4 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (4 papers), Fuel Cells and Related Materials (2 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Mercury impact and mitigation studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (506 citations), Bioengineering (412 citations), Analytical Chemistry (66 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (381 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (85 citations). Boy Høyer has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include T.M. Florence, Nina Jensen, Graeme E. Batley, G. Sørensen, Lars Kryger, Niels Holm Jensen and Niels Pind. Their work appears in journals such as Talanta, Electroanalysis, Analytical Chemistry, Electrochemistry Communications and Analytica Chimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact