Boy Høyer

720 citations
21 papers · 654 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Boy Høyer

21 papers receiving 590 citations

Peers

Boy Høyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Electrochemistry 497
  • Bioengineering 402
  • Analytical Chemistry 66
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 372
  • Polymers and Plastics 83
Replace Chaim Yarnitzky with:
Chaim Yarnitzky Israel
Agnieszka Królicka Poland
Ciprian Radovan Romania
Y. Bonfil Israel
Graeme Clarke Australia
Ivanildo Luiz de Mattos Brazil
Zuzana Navrátilová Czechia
Márcio A. Augelli Brazil
Richard G. Compton United Kingdom
Antônio de Santana Santos Brazil
Boy Høyer relative to Chaim Yarnitzky Israel Chaim Yarnitzky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Chaim Yarnitzky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Boy Høyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Boy Høyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Boy Høyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Boy Høyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Boy Høyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Boy Høyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Boy Høyer. The network helps show where Boy Høyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Boy Høyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Boy Høyer Line = papers co-authored together Boy Høyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987210
2 1987118
3 199661
4 200640
5 200333
6 199428
7 200422
8 200518
9 200117
10 198816
11 200314
12 199111
13 199311
14 200611
15 200011
16 198510
17 19866
18 19996
19 19965
20 19924

About Boy Høyer

Boy Høyer is a scholar working on Bioengineering, Electrochemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Polymers and Plastics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 654 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (18 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (16 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (4 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (4 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Fuel Cells and Related Materials (2 papers) and Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (497 citations), Bioengineering (402 citations), Analytical Chemistry (66 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (372 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (83 citations). Boy Høyer has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include T.M. Florence, Nina Jensen, Graeme E. Batley, G. Sørensen, Lars Kryger, Niels Holm Jensen and Niels Pind. Their work appears in journals such as Talanta, Analytical Chemistry, Electroanalysis, Electrochemistry Communications and Analytica Chimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact