Bowen Ding

535 citations
34 papers · 399 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Bowen Ding

31 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

Bowen Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Polymers and Plastics 85
  • Inorganic Chemistry 52
  • Automotive Engineering 39
  • Oncology 70
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 43
Replace Peiyi Li with:
Peiyi Li China
Dongni Li China
N. Rajeswari India
Ya Liu China
Hao Dong China
Xiaoxi Chen China
Yuhan Wang China
Jiajia Tan China
Bowen Ding relative to Peiyi Li China Peiyi Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Peiyi Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bowen Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bowen Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bowen Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bowen Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bowen Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bowen Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bowen Ding. The network helps show where Bowen Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bowen Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bowen Ding Line = papers co-authored together Bowen Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201174
2 202344
3 202234
4 201824
5 202322
6 202022
7 202221
8 202221
9 202218
10 202017
11 202511
12 202210
13 201210
14 20239
15 20208
16 20238
17 20227
18 20176
19 20215
20 20214

About Bowen Ding

Bowen Ding is a scholar working on Polymers and Plastics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Management Information Systems, having authored 34 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conducting polymers and applications (5 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (4 papers), Perovskite Materials and Applications (4 papers), Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms (3 papers), CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (3 papers), Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design (3 papers), Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (2 papers) and Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Polymers and Plastics (85 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (52 citations), Automotive Engineering (39 citations), Oncology (70 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (43 citations). Bowen Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hui Sun, Zhong‐Lu You, Che Wang, Peng Hou, Na Zhang, Xinchang Pang, Minying Liu, Xiaomeng Zhang, Zhe Cui and Wei Dong Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, Journal of Computational Chemistry, Polyhedron, ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications and CrystEngComm.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact