Birgit Schmook

3.4k citations
100 papers · 2.1k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Birgit Schmook

95 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Birgit Schmook
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 494
  • Global and Planetary Change 967
  • Ecological Modeling 84
  • Soil Science 172
  • Forestry 71
Replace Wayne Twine with:
Wayne Twine South Africa
Daniel Cáceres Argentina
Rinku Roy Chowdhury United States
David López‐Carr United States
Margaret B. Holland United States
Neil Dawson United Kingdom
Frank Merry United States
Dietrich Schmidt‐Vogt China
Edward A. Ellis Mexico
Carol J. Pierce Colfer Indonesia
Birgit Schmook relative to Wayne Twine South Africa Wayne Twine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Wayne Twine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Birgit Schmook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Birgit Schmook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Birgit Schmook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birgit Schmook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Birgit Schmook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Birgit Schmook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Birgit Schmook. The network helps show where Birgit Schmook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Birgit Schmook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Birgit Schmook Line = papers co-authored together Birgit Schmook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001184
2 1998101
3 200893
4 200984
5 201767
6 201165
7 201858
8 200956
9 201355
10 200854
11 201251
12 201047
13 201147
14 201347
15 201945
16 201844
17 202043
18 201542
19 201341
20 201140

About Birgit Schmook

Birgit Schmook is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Ecology, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 100 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (28 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (15 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (14 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (12 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (9 papers), Latin American rural development (9 papers), Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (7 papers) and Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (494 citations), Global and Planetary Change (967 citations), Ecological Modeling (84 citations), Soil Science (172 citations) and Forestry (71 citations). Birgit Schmook has collaborated with scholars based in Mexico, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Claudia Radel, Laura Schneider, Deborah Lawrence, Sofía Márdero, Zachary Christman, Lindsey Carte, Sophie Calmé, Colin Vance, John Rogan and Karsten Becker. Their work appears in journals such as Human Ecology, Remote Sensing Letters, World Development, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems and Journal of Environmental Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact