Birgit Schmook

3.5k citations
103 papers · 2.3k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Birgit Schmook

100 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Birgit Schmook
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 515
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.0k
  • Ecological Modeling 91
  • Forestry 80
  • Soil Science 190
Replace Daniel Cáceres with:
Daniel Cáceres Argentina
Dietrich Schmidt‐Vogt China
Rinku Roy Chowdhury United States
Frank Merry United States
Agni Klintuni Boedhihartono Australia
Geoff Cockfield Australia
Edward A. Ellis Mexico
Margaret B. Holland United States
Johan A. Oldekop United Kingdom
Eugênio Arima United States
Birgit Schmook relative to Daniel Cáceres Argentina Daniel Cáceres's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Daniel Cáceres · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Birgit Schmook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Birgit Schmook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Birgit Schmook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birgit Schmook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Birgit Schmook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Birgit Schmook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Birgit Schmook. The network helps show where Birgit Schmook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Birgit Schmook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Birgit Schmook Line = papers co-authored together Birgit Schmook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 103 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001210
2 1998113
3 200898
4 200988
5 201770
6 201168
7 200961
8 201861
9 201357
10 201255
11 200854
12 201050
13 201150
14 201349
15 201848
16 201947
17 201346
18 201545
19 202043
20 201142

About Birgit Schmook

Birgit Schmook is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Ecology, Sociology and Political Science and Plant Science, having authored 103 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (29 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (16 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (14 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (12 papers), Latin American rural development (11 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (9 papers), Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (7 papers) and Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (515 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.0k citations), Ecological Modeling (91 citations), Forestry (80 citations) and Soil Science (190 citations). Birgit Schmook has collaborated with scholars based in Mexico, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Claudia Radel, Laura Schneider, Deborah Lawrence, Sofía Márdero, Zachary Christman, Lindsey Carte, Sophie Calmé, Colin Vance, John Rogan and Rinku Roy Chowdhury. Their work appears in journals such as Human Ecology, Remote Sensing Letters, World Development, Forest Ecology and Management and Conservation Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact