Bingfeng Chen

60 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Bingfeng Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 340
  • Catalysis 387
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 730
  • Inorganic Chemistry 426
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.1k
Replace Honglei Fan with:
Honglei Fan China
Zhanrong Zhang China
Agnieszka M. Ruppert Poland
Abhijit Shrotri Japan
Song Song China
Ekaterina Makshina Belgium
Peter J. C. Hausoul Germany
Ruiqi Fang China
Benjamin Katryniok France
Bingfeng Chen relative to Honglei Fan China Honglei Fan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Honglei Fan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bingfeng Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bingfeng Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bingfeng Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bingfeng Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bingfeng Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bingfeng Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bingfeng Chen. The network helps show where Bingfeng Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bingfeng Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bingfeng Chen Line = papers co-authored together Bingfeng Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016224
2 2013190
3 2019133
4 2015127
5 2020100
6 201998
7 202496
8 201591
9 202084
10 201982
11 201364
12 202063
13 201962
14 201553
15 201452
16 202050
17 201946
18 201845
19 201640
20 201836

About Bingfeng Chen

Bingfeng Chen is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Organic Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 63 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (24 papers), Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (15 papers), Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions (12 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (10 papers), Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (9 papers), Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (9 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (8 papers) and Catalysts for Methane Reforming (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (340 citations), Catalysis (387 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (730 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (426 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (1.1k citations). Bingfeng Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Fengbo Li, Guoqing Yuan, Zhijun Huang, Huizhen Liu, Buxing Han, Tao Lü, Shaopeng Li, Zhanrong Zhang, Yanyan Wang and Xiaojun Shen. Their work appears in journals such as Green Chemistry, Chemical Science, Applied Catalysis A General, ChemSusChem and RSC Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact