Bing Wei

2.5k citations
117 papers · 1.8k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Bing Wei

113 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Bing Wei
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 441
  • Cancer Research 327
  • Oncology 503
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 362
  • Dermatology 96
Replace Hao‐Wei Wang with:
Hao‐Wei Wang United States
Bonnie L. Kemp United States
Hiroyuki Yanai Japan
Shuichi Mitsunaga Japan
Katherine E. Hutchinson United States
Maria Christina Cox Italy
Daren Shi China
Mark Lee United States
Xiaoming Xing China
Ngan‐Ming Tsang Taiwan
Bing Wei relative to Hao‐Wei Wang United States Hao‐Wei Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Hao‐Wei Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bing Wei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bing Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bing Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bing Wei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bing Wei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bing Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bing Wei. The network helps show where Bing Wei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bing Wei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bing Wei Line = papers co-authored together Bing Wei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010139
2 2014114
3 2013113
4 201483
5 201374
6
Clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study of 13 cases of melanotic schwannoma.
200573
7 200861
8 201159
9 201145
10 201940
11 201239
12 201437
13 201334
14 200729
15 200926
16
Reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson histological grading system and the complementary value of Ki-67 to this system.
201026
17 201626
18 200724
19 200824
20 201724

About Bing Wei

Bing Wei is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 117 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (14 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (11 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (9 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (8 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (5 papers), Soft tissue tumor case studies (5 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers) and Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (441 citations), Cancer Research (327 citations), Oncology (503 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (362 citations) and Dermatology (96 citations). Bing Wei has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Hong Bu, Yun Wu, Susan C. Abraham, Zhang Zhang, Huijiao Chen, Constance T. Albarracin, Hongying Zhang, Zhen Tian, Ping Tang and David G. Hicks. Their work appears in journals such as Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Journal of Clinical Pathology, Human Pathology, Medicine and Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact