Bing Ling

1.7k citations
48 papers · 1.4k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

    • Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions 10
    • Insect Pest Control Strategies 7
    • Plant Parasitism and Resistance 3
    • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology 9

Bing Ling

45 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Bing Ling
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Sensory Systems 163
  • Physiology 443
  • Insect Science 226
  • Oncology 408
  • Pharmacology 136
Replace Sue H. Kadwell with:
Sue H. Kadwell United States
Flávia Karine Rigo Brazil
Giuseppe Orsomando Italy
Yasuyuki Suzuki Japan
Maarten Gees Belgium
Nadia Moretto Italy
Mengfei Chen China
Sung‐Hee Hwang South Korea
Christopher Dunn United States
Oxana Dobrovinskaya Mexico
Bing Ling relative to Sue H. Kadwell United States Sue H. Kadwell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sue H. Kadwell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bing Ling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bing Ling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bing Ling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bing Ling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bing Ling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bing Ling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bing Ling. The network helps show where Bing Ling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bing Ling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bing Ling Line = papers co-authored together Bing Ling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011308
2 2006128
3 2011103
4 200996
5 200787
6 201287
7 201362
8 200858
9 201348
10 201346
11 200740
12 200836
13 200433
14 201430
15 200525
16 200520
17
[Chemical composition of volatile oil from Chromolaena odorata and its effect on plant, fungi and insect growth].
200318
18 201016
19 201413
20
[Allelopathic potential of volatile oil from Mikania micrantha].
200213

About Bing Ling

Bing Ling is a scholar working on Plant Science, Oncology, Molecular Biology, Physiology and Insect Science, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (10 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (9 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (7 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (4 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (3 papers), Plant-based Medicinal Research (3 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (163 citations), Physiology (443 citations), Insect Science (226 citations), Oncology (408 citations) and Pharmacology (136 citations). Bing Ling has collaborated with scholars based in China, France and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Alain Eschalier, Nicolas Authier, David Balayssac, François Coudoré, Maoxin Zhang, Juliette Descoeur, Emmanuel Bourinet, Donglin Xu, Guohui Zhou and Jérôme Busserolles. Their work appears in journals such as Insect Science, Pain, Behavioural Pharmacology, Medicine and Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact