Bing Ling
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Ion Channels and Receptors
- Oncology top 5%
- Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Papers in
-
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 8
- Oncology 10
- Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology 8
- Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms 2
- Co-authors
- Alain Eschalier (14 shared papers)Nicolas Authier (13 shared papers)David Balayssac (10 shared papers)François Coudoré (9 shared papers)Maoxin Zhang (8 shared papers)Juliette Descoeur (3 shared papers)Emmanuel Bourinet (3 shared papers)Jérôme Busserolles (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Bing Ling
36 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Sensory Systems 133
- Oncology 437
- Physiology 351
- Insect Science 125
- Plant Science 214
Countries citing papers authored by Bing Ling
This map shows the geographic impact of Bing Ling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bing Ling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bing Ling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bing Ling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bing Ling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bing Ling. The network helps show where Bing Ling may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bing Ling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 317 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 133 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 102 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 99 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 89 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 88 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 64 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 59 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 50 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 48 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 40 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 35 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 33 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 30 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 25 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 20 | |
| 17 | [Chemical composition of volatile oil from Chromolaena odorata and its effect on plant, fungi and insect growth]. | 2003 | 18 |
| 18 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 13 |
About Bing Ling
Bing Ling is a scholar working on Insect Science, Oncology, Plant Science, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Pest Control Strategies (9 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (8 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (8 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (2 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (2 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (2 papers) and Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (133 citations), Oncology (437 citations), Physiology (351 citations), Insect Science (125 citations) and Plant Science (214 citations). Bing Ling has collaborated with scholars based in China and France. Frequent co-authors include Alain Eschalier, Nicolas Authier, David Balayssac, François Coudoré, Maoxin Zhang, Juliette Descoeur, Emmanuel Bourinet, Jérôme Busserolles, Donglin Xu and Guohui Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as Insect Science, Pain, Neuropharmacology, Toxicology and Chemotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.