Binbin Yang

850 citations
40 papers · 494 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Binbin Yang

38 papers receiving 486 citations

Peers

Binbin Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Ophthalmology 36
  • Developmental Neuroscience 17
  • Rehabilitation 25
  • Aging 7
  • Biomaterials 50
Replace Thomas Stahnke with:
Thomas Stahnke Germany
Albert Sufianov Russia
Jing Tian China
Cheng‐Hsien Lin Taiwan
Zahra Khodabandeh Iran
Sang‐Ha Oh South Korea
Miao He China
Vasily N. Manskikh Russia
Binbin Yang relative to Thomas Stahnke Germany Thomas Stahnke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Thomas Stahnke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Binbin Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Binbin Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Binbin Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Binbin Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Binbin Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Binbin Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Binbin Yang. The network helps show where Binbin Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Binbin Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Binbin Yang Line = papers co-authored together Binbin Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202247
2 200744
3 202343
4 201830
5 202429
6 201929
7 202124
8 202119
9 201219
10 202218
11 201018
12 201218
13 202116
14 201114
15 201513
16 201813
17
[A study on the association of apolipoprotein E genotypes with primary open-angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma in northeast of China].
200712
18 20109
19 20179
20 20178

About Binbin Yang

Binbin Yang is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cell Biology, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 40 papers that have together received 494 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (3 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (3 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (3 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (2 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (2 papers) and RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (36 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (17 citations), Rehabilitation (25 citations), Aging (7 citations) and Biomaterials (50 citations). Binbin Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Huiping Yuan, Vivek Garg, Jundong Jiao, Keli Hu, Xiaoqiu Tan, Tao Li, Yiyan Yu, Junliang Chen, Gang Tao and Zhiping Hu. Their work appears in journals such as Current Neurovascular Research, Molecular Biology Reports, Frontiers in Pediatrics, Food Science & Nutrition and Advanced Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact