Bin Lin

624 citations
31 papers · 420 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Bin Lin

29 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers

Bin Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Accounting 85
  • Geography, Planning and Development 25
  • Aerospace Engineering 87
  • Economics and Econometrics 85
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 71
Replace Jae-Jun Kim with:
Jae-Jun Kim South Korea
Sergei S. Sokolov Russia
Meng Jun Song China
Chunhua Chen China
Johan Torstensson Sweden
Jingqi Wang China
Anatoliy Pavlovich Nyrkov Russia
Seyed Ali Nabavi Chashmi Türkiye
Xianghui Yuan China
Bin Lin relative to Jae-Jun Kim South Korea Jae-Jun Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.3×
Jae-Jun Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bin Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bin Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bin Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bin Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bin Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bin Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bin Lin. The network helps show where Bin Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bin Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bin Lin Line = papers co-authored together Bin Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012115
2 202145
3 201935
4 201732
5 202124
6 202218
7 202317
8 202117
9 202314
10 202312
11 202311
12 202411
13 201910
14 20239
15 20237
16 20217
17 20226
18 20216
19 20225
20 20244

About Bin Lin

Bin Lin is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Aerospace Engineering, Accounting, Geology and Media Technology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (8 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (5 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (5 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (4 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (4 papers), Advanced Measurement and Detection Methods (4 papers) and 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (85 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (25 citations), Aerospace Engineering (87 citations), Economics and Econometrics (85 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (71 citations). Bin Lin has collaborated with scholars based in China, Singapore and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Jin Liu, Xiaohu Zhang, Shiyi Chen, Chunli Liu, Jie Wang, Wei Shu, Xiaohu Zhang, Xia Yang, Jifeng Guo and Ying Chen. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Measurement and Aerospace Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact