Bibo Li
Impact in
- Aging top 1%
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Physiology top 2%
- Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Papers in
- Epidemiology 34
- Trypanosoma species research and implications 33
- Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research 14
-
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 10
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 4
- Co-authors
- Titia de Lange (4 shared papers)George Cross (3 shared papers)Unnati M. Pandya (5 shared papers)Xiaofeng Yang (1 shared paper)Luísa M. Figueiredo (1 shared paper)Harry Scherthan (1 shared paper)Tycho Lock (1 shared paper)Susan Smith (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nucleic Acids Research (6 papers)Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry (4 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)Cell Research (2 papers)Frontiers in Oncology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Bibo Li
61 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Aging 202
- Physiology 744
- Epidemiology 604
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Parasitology 93
Countries citing papers authored by Bibo Li
This map shows the geographic impact of Bibo Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bibo Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bibo Li more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bibo Li
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bibo Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bibo Li. The network helps show where Bibo Li may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bibo Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 473 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 140 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 137 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 125 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 74 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 55 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 54 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 53 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 52 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 49 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 42 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 36 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 32 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 31 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 28 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 28 |
About Bibo Li
Bibo Li is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trypanosoma species research and implications (33 papers), Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (18 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (14 papers), Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (12 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (10 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (5 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (5 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (202 citations), Physiology (744 citations), Epidemiology (604 citations), Molecular Biology (1.1k citations) and Parasitology (93 citations). Bibo Li has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Titia de Lange, George Cross, Unnati M. Pandya, Xiaofeng Yang, Luísa M. Figueiredo, Harry Scherthan, Tycho Lock, Susan Smith, Maj Hultén and Oliver Dreesen. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, PLoS ONE, Cell Research and Frontiers in Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.