Bibing Dai

587 citations
23 papers · 430 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Bibing Dai

22 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

Bibing Dai
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Applied Psychology 63
  • Clinical Psychology 142
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 8
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 68
  • Health 30
Replace Nicolas Aureli with:
Nicolas Aureli Italy
Anne Margit Reitsema Netherlands
Adam Pettitt United States
Guangteng Meng China
Neshat Yazdani United States
Iwona Nowakowska Poland
Daicia Price United States
Yumei Li China
Germaine Y. Q. Tng Singapore
Anna Zajenkowska Poland
Bibing Dai relative to Nicolas Aureli Italy Nicolas Aureli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Nicolas Aureli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bibing Dai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bibing Dai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bibing Dai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bibing Dai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bibing Dai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bibing Dai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bibing Dai. The network helps show where Bibing Dai may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bibing Dai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bibing Dai Line = papers co-authored together Bibing Dai links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020102
2 201975
3 202141
4 201241
5 202127
6 202221
7 202119
8 202217
9 202316
10 202415
11 201313
12 20238
13 20117
14 20157
15 20185
16 20134
17 20104
18 20242
19 20222
20 20241

About Bibing Dai

Bibing Dai is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (5 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers) and Disaster Management and Resilience (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (63 citations), Clinical Psychology (142 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (8 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (68 citations) and Health (30 citations). Bibing Dai has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Xun Liu, Guangteng Meng, Qi Li, Qi Li, Di Fu, Bingsheng Liu, Baoshan Zhang, Juan Li, Yang Zhong and Ya Zheng. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Frontiers in Psychiatry, BMC Psychiatry, Journal of Happiness Studies and Frontiers in Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact