Beth Theis

411 citations
8 papers · 317 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • Dermatology top 10%
    • Skin Protection and Aging
    • Cancer Risks and Factors
    • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
    • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

Papers in

Beth Theis

8 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Beth Theis
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Dermatology 73
  • Oncology 184
  • Cancer Research 69
  • Genetics 107
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 52
Replace L G Skinner with:
L G Skinner United Kingdom
Yujuan Xiang China
Melanie Bewerunge‐Hudler Germany
Helen Snowden United Kingdom
Judith Youngson United Kingdom
Paul Affleck United Kingdom
Wendy Kohlmann United States
P. England United Kingdom
Amelia K. Hausauer United States
Arup R. Chakraborty United States
Beth Theis relative to L G Skinner United Kingdom L G Skinner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
L G Skinner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Theis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Theis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Theis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Theis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Theis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Theis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Theis. The network helps show where Beth Theis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beth Theis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth Theis Line = papers co-authored together Beth Theis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
Hormonal factors and the risk of breast cancer according to estrogen- and progesterone-receptor subgroup.
2003117
2 200788
3 199482
4 20058
5
Cervical Cancer in Ontario 1971-1996
19998
6
Evaluation of a risk factor survey with three assessment methods.
20027
7 20084
8
Challenges of developing a cervical screening information system: the Ontario pilot project.
19983

About Beth Theis

Beth Theis is a scholar working on Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Dermatology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Genetics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Skin Protection and Aging (2 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (2 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (1 paper), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (1 paper) and Medical Coding and Health Information (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (73 citations), Oncology (184 citations), Cancer Research (69 citations), Genetics (107 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (52 citations). Beth Theis has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Michelle Cotterchio, Margaret Sloan, Nancy Kreiger, G B Lockwood, David Tritchler, Norman F. Boyd, Loraine D. Marrett, Peter A. Kanetsky, Terence Dwyer and Robert C. Millikan. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Causes & Control, American Journal of Epidemiology, European Journal of Cancer Prevention and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact