Beth Kerr

1.2k citations
18 papers · 1.0k · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Beth Kerr

18 papers receiving 947 citations

Peers

Beth Kerr
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 295
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 573
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 200
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 85
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 137
Replace Diane C. Shapiro with:
Diane C. Shapiro United States
James Lyons Canada
Suvobrata Mitra United Kingdom
Denis J. Glencross Australia
John F. Larish United States
Hermann Müller Germany
Kuniyasu Imanaka Japan
Arend W. A. Van Gemmert United States
Mark Gardner United Kingdom
Yeou-Teh Liu United States
Beth Kerr relative to Diane C. Shapiro United States Diane C. Shapiro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Diane C. Shapiro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Kerr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Kerr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Kerr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Kerr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Kerr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Kerr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Kerr. The network helps show where Beth Kerr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Beth Kerr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth Kerr Line = papers co-authored together Beth Kerr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1985303
2 1973270
3 1985210
4 197891
5 197532
6 197427
7 197818
8 197914
9 199513
10 198310
11 19828
12 19837
13 19807
14 19836
15 19925
16 19794
17 19982
18 19761

About Beth Kerr

Beth Kerr is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Automotive Engineering, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (5 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (3 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (295 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (573 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (200 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (85 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (137 citations). Beth Kerr has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sandra M. Condon, Laura A. McDonald, Raymond M. Klein, Heather Carmichael Olson, Earl Hunt, Ann P. Streissguth, Stephen M. Haley, Janet E. Davidson, Frances L. Wilkie and Patricia N. Prinz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Journal of Motor Behavior, Memory & Cognition, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology and Psychological Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact