Beth A. Lanning

38 papers receiving 714 citations

Peers

Beth A. Lanning
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Health 156
  • Applied Psychology 47
  • Equine 15
  • Gender Studies 74
  • Clinical Psychology 142
Replace Alexa Smith‐Osborne with:
Alexa Smith‐Osborne United States
Alan A. Cavaiola United States
Øivind Ekeberg Norway
Mary C. Acri United States
Müjgan Alikaşifoğlu Türkiye
Lotta Sahlqvist Sweden
Kathleen J. Farkas United States
Finola R. Ferry United Kingdom
Henrika Jormfeldt Sweden
Leslie K. Robbins United States
Beth A. Lanning relative to Alexa Smith‐Osborne United States Alexa Smith‐Osborne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
Alexa Smith‐Osborne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth A. Lanning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth A. Lanning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth A. Lanning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth A. Lanning more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth A. Lanning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth A. Lanning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth A. Lanning. The network helps show where Beth A. Lanning may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beth A. Lanning, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth A. Lanning Line = papers co-authored together Beth A. Lanning links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018113
2 201496
3 201550
4 201342
5 202036
6 200733
7 201833
8 201732
9 202028
10
Teachers' Attitudes towards Abstinence-Only Sex Education Curricula
200328
11 202027
12 202019
13 201818
14 202016
15 201815
16 201815
17 202113
18 202012
19 202212
20 202111

About Beth A. Lanning

Beth A. Lanning is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions and Physiology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 754 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (6 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (5 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers), Physical Activity and Health (3 papers), Sex work and related issues (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (156 citations), Applied Psychology (47 citations), Equine (15 citations), Gender Studies (74 citations) and Clinical Psychology (142 citations). Beth A. Lanning has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ghana and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Megan S. Patterson, Matthew Asare, Jack D. Tubbs, Kelly R. Ylitalo, Rodney G. Bowden, A. Alexander Beaujean, Jane Richards Montealegre, M. Renée Umstattd Meyer, Rebecca Jones and Rafer S. Lutz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American College Health, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of School Health, Journal of Nephrology and The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact