Berry Button
Impact in
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Papers in
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 4
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 1
-
- Kruppel-like factors research 1
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Ben Ho Park (7 shared papers)Kelly Kyker‐Snowman (6 shared papers)Karen Cravero (6 shared papers)David Chu (5 shared papers)Rory L. Cochran (4 shared papers)Sarah Croessmann (4 shared papers)Christopher D. Gocke (2 shared papers)Daniel J. Zabransky (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (2 papers)Clinical Cancer Research (1 paper)Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (1 paper)Genes & Diseases (1 paper)Oncotarget (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Berry Button
7 papers receiving 78 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Cancer Research 43
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 28
- Dermatology 12
- Oncology 34
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 18
Countries citing papers authored by Berry Button
This map shows the geographic impact of Berry Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Berry Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Berry Button more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Berry Button
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Berry Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Berry Button. The network helps show where Berry Button may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Berry Button, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 2 |
About Berry Button
Berry Button is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 79 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers), Kruppel-like factors research (1 paper), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (1 paper), Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (1 paper), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (1 paper) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (43 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (28 citations), Dermatology (12 citations), Oncology (34 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (18 citations). Berry Button has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ben Ho Park, Kelly Kyker‐Snowman, Karen Cravero, David Chu, Rory L. Cochran, Sarah Croessmann, Christopher D. Gocke, Daniel J. Zabransky, Ian Waters and Katie Beierl. Their work appears in journals such as Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Clinical Cancer Research, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Genes & Diseases and Oncotarget.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.