Bernard Freeman

11 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Bernard Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 237
  • Clinical Psychology 276
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 167
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 145
  • Genetics 225
Replace Cloninger Cr with:
Cloninger Cr United States
Rohan H. C. Palmer United States
S. Tuinier Netherlands
Jorge Moya Spain
Cecilia Marino Italy
Randy Katz Canada
Katja Karg Germany
Marijn A. Distel Netherlands
Tulin Z. Ozkaragoz United States
Jungeun Song South Korea
Bernard Freeman relative to Cloninger Cr United States Cloninger Cr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Cloninger Cr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bernard Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bernard Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernard Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernard Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bernard Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernard Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernard Freeman. The network helps show where Bernard Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bernard Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bernard Freeman Line = papers co-authored together Bernard Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2000373
2 2003284
3 1997219
4 1997115
5 199942
6 200342
7 199830
8 200212
9 20006
10
Gene X cannabis interaction: Case-only design analysis in a first-episode psychosis sample
20062
11
Association study of extreme high and low neuroticism, with genetic markers for the dopaminergic system.
19981

About Bernard Freeman

Bernard Freeman is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Genetics, Clinical Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (2 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Genetic diversity and population structure (1 paper) and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (237 citations), Clinical Psychology (276 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (167 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (145 citations) and Genetics (225 citations). Bernard Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ian Craig, Robert J. Plomin, Thomas S. Price, Lorna Ebersole, Stephen A. Petrill, David Ball, Linzy Hill, Jonathan S. Mill, Neil R. Smith and Charles J. C. Curtis. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics, Molecular Psychiatry, Behavior Genetics, Trends in biotechnology and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact