Benoît Verdon

544 citations
76 papers · 213 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Benoît Verdon

52 papers receiving 170 citations

Peers

Benoît Verdon
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Applied Psychology 59
  • Clinical Psychology 121
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 6
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 27
  • General Health Professions 26
Replace Jan Dieris-Hirche with:
Jan Dieris-Hirche Germany
Yoav Groweiss Israel
Julia Bland United Kingdom
Paola Lucena‐Santos Brazil
C Mory Germany
Tim McDougall United Kingdom
Odeta Geležėlytė Lithuania
Ana Ciprić Denmark
Stefan Beher Germany
Chad S. G. Witcher Canada
Benoît Verdon relative to Jan Dieris-Hirche Germany Jan Dieris-Hirche's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.5×
Jan Dieris-Hirche · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Verdon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Verdon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Verdon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Verdon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Verdon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Verdon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Verdon. The network helps show where Benoît Verdon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Verdon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît Verdon Line = papers co-authored together Benoît Verdon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201330
2 202021
3 201411
4 20088
5 20118
6 20128
7 20037
8
Boletim Academia Paulista de Psicologia
20137
9 20157
10 20207
11 20026
12 20166
13 20065
14 20075
15 20105
16 20044
17 20144
18 20144
19 20063
20 20113

About Benoît Verdon

Benoît Verdon is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 76 papers that have together received 213 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (32 papers), Psychology and Mental Health (23 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (18 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (10 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (9 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Aging, Health, and Disability (3 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (59 citations), Clinical Psychology (121 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (6 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (27 citations) and General Health Professions (26 citations). Benoît Verdon has collaborated with scholars based in France. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Azoulay, Catherine Chabert, Annie Kurtz, Michèle Emmanuelli, Caroline A. Thompson, Marc‐Olivier Bitker, Michèle Lévy-Soussan, Sabine Sportouch, L. Verneuil and Jordan Sibéoni. Their work appears in journals such as L Encéphale, Qualitative Research in Psychology, L Évolution Psychiatrique, Neurology Clinical Practice and Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact