Benoit Marabout
Impact in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Nerve injury and regeneration
Papers in
-
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 2
- Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds 1
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 1
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 1
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration 1
- Co-authors
- Mireille Sevrin (2 shared papers)Pascal George (2 shared papers)Y. Claustre (1 shared paper)Jesús Bénavidès (1 shared paper)Badia Ferzaz (1 shared paper)Michaël Schumacher (1 shared paper)B. Scatton (1 shared paper)Philippe Lière (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Organic Chemistry (2 papers)Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (1 paper)Tetrahedron Asymmetry (1 paper)Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Benoit Marabout
5 papers receiving 179 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 62
- Developmental Neuroscience 11
- Organic Chemistry 73
- Neurology 13
- Behavioral Neuroscience 4
Countries citing papers authored by Benoit Marabout
This map shows the geographic impact of Benoit Marabout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoit Marabout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoit Marabout more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benoit Marabout
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoit Marabout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoit Marabout. The network helps show where Benoit Marabout may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoit Marabout, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 109 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 46 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 12 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 2 |
About Benoit Marabout
Benoit Marabout is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Pharmaceutical Science and Oncology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 188 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers), Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (1 paper), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (1 paper), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (1 paper), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (1 paper), Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper) and Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (62 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (11 citations), Organic Chemistry (73 citations), Neurology (13 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (4 citations). Benoit Marabout has collaborated with scholars based in France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mireille Sevrin, Pascal George, Y. Claustre, Jesús Bénavidès, Badia Ferzaz, Michaël Schumacher, B. Scatton, Philippe Lière, Jacqueline Fournier and Jean-Pierre Nowicki. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Tetrahedron Asymmetry and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.