Benoit Malpaux

8 papers receiving 599 citations

Peers

Benoit Malpaux
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 372
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 170
  • Reproductive Medicine 97
  • Aging 15
  • Animal Science and Zoology 73
Replace J Arendt with:
J Arendt United Kingdom
G. E. Webley United Kingdom
Didier Chesneau France
Jean‐Paul Ravault France
Alexandra Rao Australia
E. L. Bittman United States
A. Daveau France
Constance S. Campbell United States
Béatrice Bothorel France
A. L. Poulton United Kingdom
Benoit Malpaux relative to J Arendt United Kingdom J Arendt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
J Arendt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoit Malpaux

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoit Malpaux's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoit Malpaux with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoit Malpaux more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoit Malpaux

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoit Malpaux. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoit Malpaux. The network helps show where Benoit Malpaux may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Benoit Malpaux, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoit Malpaux Line = papers co-authored together Benoit Malpaux links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2001292
2 1999111
3
Origin of cerebrospinal fluid melatonin and possible function in the integration of photoperiod.
200385
4 200948
5 200832
6 199729
7 200420
8 20169

About Benoit Malpaux

Benoit Malpaux is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Agronomy and Crop Science, Social Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (5 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (3 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (3 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (2 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (1 paper) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (372 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (170 citations), Reproductive Medicine (97 citations), Aging (15 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (73 citations). Benoit Malpaux has collaborated with scholars based in France, Mexico and Morocco. Frequent co-authors include Philippe Chemineau, Hélène Tricoire-Leignel, Martine Migaud, Morten Møller, Angeles De Santiago-Miramontes, J.A. Delgadillo, R. J. Scaramuzzi, G. Fitz-Rodríguez, Catherine Viguié and Yves Tillet. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Reproduction Science, animal, Journal of Pineal Research, Endocrinology and Journal of Biological Rhythms.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact