Benoît Leclerc

2.6k citations
76 papers · 1.9k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Benoît Leclerc

72 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Benoît Leclerc
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Clinical Psychology 1k
  • Gender Studies 390
  • Sociology and Political Science 727
  • Law 124
  • Information Systems 202
Replace Billy Henson with:
Billy Henson United States
Erika Rackley United Kingdom
Julia C. Davidson United Kingdom
David Maimon United States
Garth James Davies Canada
Matthew James Tonkin United Kingdom
Katarina Fritzon Australia
Molly Dragiewicz Australia
Caroline A. Spiranovic Australia
Stella C. Chia Hong Kong
Benoît Leclerc relative to Billy Henson United States Billy Henson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.9×
Billy Henson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Leclerc

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Leclerc's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Leclerc with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Leclerc more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Leclerc

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Leclerc. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Leclerc. The network helps show where Benoît Leclerc may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Leclerc, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît Leclerc Line = papers co-authored together Benoît Leclerc links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007172
2 2007144
3 2011139
4 2011112
5 200894
6 201461
7 200758
8 200557
9 201556
10 201355
11 201250
12 200747
13 200943
14 201643
15 201041
16 201536
17 201034
18 201430
19
Strategies adopted by sexual offenders to involve children in sexual activity
200628
20 200727

About Benoît Leclerc

Benoît Leclerc is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Health and Law, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (43 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (25 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (18 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (8 papers), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (5 papers), Military, Security, and Education Studies (4 papers), Criminal Justice and Penology (4 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1k citations), Gender Studies (390 citations), Sociology and Political Science (727 citations), Law (124 citations) and Information Systems (202 citations). Benoît Leclerc has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Éric Beauregard, Jean Proulx, Richard Wortley, STEPHEN W. SMALLBONE, Jesse Cale, Patrick Lussier, Michael Townsley, Jean-François Allaire, Danielle M. Reynald and D. Kim Rossmo. Their work appears in journals such as Sexual Abuse, Criminal Justice and Behavior, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Journal of Criminal Justice and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact