Benoît Debord

1.7k citations
55 papers · 1.1k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Benoît Debord

51 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Benoît Debord
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 574
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.0k
  • Spectroscopy 107
  • Biophysics 20
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 3
Replace M. Alharbi with:
M. Alharbi France
Alexander Hartung Germany
Andrey Pryamikov Russia
Florian Emaury Switzerland
Wenxue Li China
Clemens Herkommer Germany
T.P. Hansen Denmark
Ksenia A. Fedorova United Kingdom
Foued Amrani France
Ofer Gayer Israel
Benoît Debord relative to M. Alharbi France M. Alharbi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
M. Alharbi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Debord

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Debord's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Debord with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Debord more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Debord

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Debord. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Debord. The network helps show where Benoît Debord may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Debord, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît Debord Line = papers co-authored together Benoît Debord links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017252
2 2019128
3 2013116
4 201499
5 201360
6 202256
7 202146
8 201445
9 201531
10 201730
11 201524
12 201624
13 201819
14
Active engineering of four-wave mixing spectral entanglement in hollow-core fibers
201915
15 201915
16 201514
17 202212
18 202212
19 20199
20 20167

About Benoît Debord

Benoît Debord is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photonic Crystal and Fiber Optics (48 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (37 papers), Optical Network Technologies (22 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (15 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (10 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (4 papers) and Quantum optics and atomic interactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (574 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.0k citations), Spectroscopy (107 citations), Biophysics (20 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (3 citations). Benoît Debord has collaborated with scholars based in France, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Frédéric Gérôme, Fetah Benabid, Luca Vincetti, M. Alharbi, Foued Amrani, Matthieu Chafer, Martin Maurel, Abhilash Amsanpally, A.I. Baz and Florent Scol. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Optics Letters, Optica, Journal of Lightwave Technology and Physical Review Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact