Benoît Béranger

721 citations
26 papers · 370 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Benoît Béranger

22 papers receiving 358 citations

Peers

Benoît Béranger
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 174
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 88
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 53
  • Neurology 51
  • Neurology 29
Replace Lilit Mnatsakanyan with:
Lilit Mnatsakanyan United States
Victor Marinho Brazil
Siyu Liu China
Claudinei Eduardo Biazoli Brazil
Carsten Urbanek Germany
Theodoros S. Constantinidis Greece
Elisabetta Geda Italy
Stefano Orsolini Italy
Annette Beatrix Bruehl Switzerland
Benoît Béranger relative to Lilit Mnatsakanyan United States Lilit Mnatsakanyan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Lilit Mnatsakanyan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Béranger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Béranger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Béranger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Béranger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Béranger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Béranger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Béranger. The network helps show where Benoît Béranger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Béranger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît Béranger Line = papers co-authored together Benoît Béranger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018137
2 202262
3 201836
4 202434
5 202315
6 202013
7 202011
8
Multivariate classification provides a neural signature of Tourette disorder: Running head: Multivariate analysis of Tourette disorder
20218
9 20248
10 20198
11 20258
12 20248
13 20217
14 20234
15 20214
16 20241
17 20251
18 20211
19 20231
20 20251

About Benoît Béranger

Benoît Béranger is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Neurology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 370 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (6 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (174 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (88 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (53 citations), Neurology (51 citations) and Neurology (29 citations). Benoît Béranger has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Tallon‐Baudry, Ignacio Rebollo, Anne-Dominique Devauchelle, Emmanuelle Volle, Yoed N. Kenett, Marcela Ovando‐Tellez, Mathias Benedek, Yulia Worbe, Marion Houot and Hugues Chabriat. Their work appears in journals such as Communications Biology, Movement Disorders, Brain, Clinical Neurophysiology and Translational Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact