Benjamin Stecher

526 citations
3 papers · 248 · h-index 3

Impact in

  • Neurology top 10%
    • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
    • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
    • Neurological disorders and treatments
    • Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
    • Nerve injury and regeneration

Papers in

Benjamin Stecher

3 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers

Benjamin Stecher
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Neurology 157
  • Neurology 75
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 69
  • Biological Psychiatry 5
  • Physiology 49
Replace Laura Vargas‐González with:
Laura Vargas‐González Spain
Gioia Marino Italy
Elena Contaldi Italy
Klaus Jan Rath Germany
Roubina Antonelou Greece
Gary Rafaloff United States
Chen-Jie Cao China
Annika Kluge Germany
Katharina Waniek Germany
Hiroyuki Sumikura Japan
Benjamin Stecher relative to Laura Vargas‐González Spain Laura Vargas‐González's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Laura Vargas‐González · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Stecher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Stecher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Stecher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Stecher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Stecher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Stecher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Stecher. The network helps show where Benjamin Stecher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Stecher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Stecher Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Stecher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

3 of 3 papers shown

About Benjamin Stecher

Benjamin Stecher is a scholar working on Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Physiology, having authored 3 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (1 paper), Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper), Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (1 paper), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (157 citations), Neurology (75 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (69 citations), Biological Psychiatry (5 citations) and Physiology (49 citations). Benjamin Stecher has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michaela Johnson, Viviane Labrie, Lena Brundin, Patrik Brundin, Claire Chan, Alberto J. Espay, Sadaquate Khan, Miratul M. K. Muqit, Tilo Kunath and Matthew D. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Trends in Neurosciences, European Journal of Neuroscience and Cambridge University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact